April 30, 2018

Grim Fandango


Man, I really wanted to love this game. Thought I dabbled with it way back in 1998 or so, then recently bought it on the PS4 for a trip down memory lane. Nope! I have no idea what I remember playing as a kid on the computer in 1998, but it almost certainly wasn't Grim Fandango, which is one of the hardest point-and-click adventure games I've ever experienced.

I mean, the dialogue and design were nice and all, but when you need to consult a walkthrough immediately just to get through the very beginning stages of the game - to really begin to play it at all, I guess - I dunno, that's not floating my boat in 2018. Are you really "playing" a game when you're consulting a guide for every single instruction and next step? And if not, is there any difference between playing it yourself and just watching a playthrough on YouTube? And I mean, I was totally down to play an enjoyable game for five or ten hours, but not to just go through the motions.

Shit. I wanted to love this one! And I couldn't. I failed. I was too dumb to figure out what weird combination of balloon animals and hole punches were needed to get my car fixed down in the garage, or something, despite a fifty-line dialogue tree with a receptionist, and it was all downhill from there. This is on me, guys. I fucked up. I never should have bothered!

Jane the Virgin: Season 4


This has still gotta be one of the shows I'm most embarrassed to admit I watch, but that's because of its title and concept, not the show itself. Four seasons in, Jane the Virgin remains one of the better (best?) shows on television. I've bailed on so many network shows over the years, and hour-longs are particularly enticing to just cut bait with. But Jane? Jane is good, and Jane is also specific and unique, which only makes it more good. Hey, there's a word for "more good," and that word is "better." I've lost the thread on this one. Sorry! Anyway, looking forward to the fifth and potentially final season.

April 21, 2018

One Day at a Time: Season 1


Here's one that TV critic Twitter won't shut the fuck up about - Netflix's re...make? reboot? of One Day at a Time. I threw it on in the background a couple months ago, watched an episode, thought it was fine but nothing special, and watched maybe two or three more sporadically over the next few weeks. But as so often is the case with sitcoms, this picked up steam and charm and likability as it went on. I've finished the first season now, and yeah, I can safely say I really like this show.

All it is, really, is a throwback sitcom that isn't afraid to "get real" and discuss controvoersial issues the way real people do. At the center of this one is a Cuban-American family living in Los Angeles and variously dealing with, among other things, PTSD, generational gender role strife, immigration politics in 2017, discovering and understanding sexual identities, being teenagers, being mothers, being Cubans, being Americans. It's not heavy, by any stretch, and that's probably why it works so well; it's just a generally upbeat, genuinely likable show about a family in 2017.

Also, mad props to Rita Moreno, 84 years old here and still just crushing it.

April 20, 2018

Stan's Book Dump: Winter 2018

What am I doing!?

Here's what's up - although I'm convinced no one still reads this blog, and although I do all my book-loggin' over at Goodreads these days, I still can't help but chuck a bunch of quick takes here, all sloppy-written and rambling and not trying to impress anybody, just talking about how and when and why I even acquired some of these books, and what inspired me to read them. Got it? Cool. Here we go - it's everything I read through March.


Mrs. Fletcher by Tom Perrotta
Opened the year with Tom Perrotta's newest. Now, I like Perrotta, but everything I've read of his seems to fall into "good, not great" territory. They're generally decent stories that gently satirize or lampoon our modern American society, and in particular the ways adults can act like children (never more so than in Little Children) but nothing has really blown me away as a cutting or thrilling or sweeping read. (The Leftovers made for an excellent TV show, but the book on which it was based was so much smaller and less ambitious in its scope.) Sadly, Mrs. Fletcher felt like the emptiest and weakest and most by-the-numbers offering from Perrotta that I've read to date. It's about a single middle-aged woman, sad and lonely after her only son leaves for college, using the Internet to make new connections and find new hobbies and mostly just watch porn. It's also about that son, overwhelmed and out of his element and hopelessly un-woke at college in 2017, perhaps also just seeking human connection. I dunno, it just didn't really resonate with me in a meaningful way beyond "going away to college is hard, being an empty nester means sexually awakening." God, can I relate to that cover, though.


Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout
My grandparents winter in Florida every year, and apparently all they do there is read. (And why not?) So every year they go down there with, or otherwise acquire, dozens of books. And one thing that happens every few years when I visit them is that my grandmother will tell me to go through their big pile of already-read books and see if there are any I want before she throws or gives them all away. It's a pretty low percentage of books that ends up getting pulled from the pile, but I always seem to come away with two or three free books I wouldn't have bought myself but would still be curious to read. This is one of those books. At any rate, I saw the HBO miniseries adaptation of Olive Kitteridge a few years back, starring Frances McDormand, and frankly there's no way at all I was ever going to be picturing anyone but Frances McDormand as I read the book. The book was fine! I think the miniseries was better, but that could just be the bias that comes with seeing it first.


Cannery Row by John Steinbeck
So, a thing I try to do whenever I travel somewhere new is read a book from or otherwise about the place I'm going. Bought this one before a trip to Monterey and Big Sur in September of 2016, finally got around to reading it in February of 2018. I'm a bit behind! At any rate, this is the third Steinbeck book I've read, and they all seem to blend together in that same Great Depression California way. I think this is my least favorite of his offerings so far, but that's got more to do with Of Mice and Men being an all time classic and The Pearl hitting me right in a very specific sweet spot. Someday I'll get around to his bigger fish like The Grapes of Wrath or East of Eden but so far a hundred pages of Steinbeck every few years has been plenty for me, so, no rush I suppose.


The One-Eyed Man by Ron Currie
Ron Currie's absolutely one of my favorite authors of the last decade or so, a real modern-day Kurt Vonnegut, a guy who blends melancholy and absurdity and tragedy and the magnitude of the universe so brilliantly and wonderfully. I can't recommend his work enough - go ahead and jump blindly into Everything Matters! and you won't be disappointed. That said, I fear that The One-Eyed Man was his weakest effort to date. It's just messier and smaller than his previous books. Still plenty funny, but less touching, less tight. The silver lining here is that even a "bad" Ron Currie book is a pure delight to read, as far as I'm concerned; this was "merely" a four-out-of-five-star read.


Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders
I think George Saunders is immensely talented. The very structure of this novel, his first, is unlike anything I've ever read. But I can't say for certain that I loved this book. The concept is almost hauntingly beautiful. Here's some real history. Abraham Lincoln, in the early stages of the Civil War, lost his son Willie to a sudden illness. Willie's body was temporarily interred at a crypt in Washington before being transported to a final resting place in Illinois. A distraught, grieving Lincoln entered the crypt late at night on multiple occasions to hold his boy's body. Saunders was so moved by that image - the idea of a sitting President holding his dead son on multiple occasions - that he concocted this surreal story, in which Willie Lincoln and dozens of other departed souls in the crypt are all hanging out in this weird plane of an afterlife - the "bardo" - unaware that they have died but unable to move on. Stuck in limbo, as it were. And when Abe Lincoln arrives to cradle Willie's body, the rest of the souls are absolutely awe-struck, because no one ever touches their bodies anymore, holds them, hugs them, and so on. It's beautiful stuff, really. My big reservation here is that the format of the book, which lends itself so well to the disorienting nature of, you know, other planes of existence, makes for a rather confusing read where it's often not apparent who's talking or what's actually being said. Now, Nick Offerman and Megan Mullally have purchased the right to adapt this thing into a movie, which should be extremely interesting for better or worse, and which will definitely be something I keep my eye on.


Veins by Drew
That's Drew as in @drewtoothpaste, webcomic author and solid Twitter follow. Here's a short little something that he published in 2011 and that I've had my eye on for at least a few years. It's... dark! It's really something. It's a tragicomedy about a very dumb and socially inept man who's loathed by everyone around him, including his parents, except for himself. That's about the gist of it. Someone on Goodreads compared the whole thing to an anti-Forrest Gump of sorts - a tale in which a terribly stupid man doesn't get rewarded in life for being a blissful idiot, but relentlessly punished instead. There's a chance that this was an absolutely genius piece of writing, an anti-novel, a total trolljob of a story, but at least on its surface it's just a depressing story about an utterly unremarkable character.


Nausea by Jean-Paul Sartre
Had pretty high hopes for this one after reading and mostly loving the works of Albert Camus over the last few years. Turns out Sartre isn't nearly the novelist Camus was, which is a damn shame. The whole gist of this one seems to be that the narrator is experiencing a noteworthy and escalating sense of "existential dread," back in the 1930s before that term - perhaps even that concept? - existed. But what it boils down to is a weird philosophy in which basically only nouns have meaning and adjectives do not; the "essence" of some tangible "thing" obfuscates its existence, I guess. Like, a necktie is a necktie, but when a necktie is purple it ceases to be a necktie because it's purple. And that'll make you nauseous, maybe? I dunno, it's very possible I whiffed on truly understanding something deeper about this one, but I don't really think that's the case.


The Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead
Here's a solid piece of magical realism in which the historical underground railroad of the antebellum South is, in fact, a true and literal underground railroad, shuffling runaway slaves northward toward freedom. The book pulls no punches depicting the horrible inhumanities of chattel slavery, where life is nasty, brutal, and short. I thought it was an excellent but harrowing read, reminiscent of The Odyssey, a determined young woman's quest to make it "home" (to freedom) while everyone who joins or otherwise assists her ends up worse off for it. It's a book that feels equally painful and necessary. Definitely worth a read.


Little Fires Everywhere by Celeste Ng
Really enjoyed this. I'd never heard of Celeste Ng before Little Fires Everywhere popped up all over assorted "Best of 2017" lists, which is sort of surprising since her debut novel Everything I Never Told You seems to be even more beloved. Anyway, this one was a delight, mixing themes of class and motherhood and privacy in delightful ways. Felt a lot like a Tom Perrotta book (see above!) but better. I'd like to get to Everything I Never Told You soon, but the backlog is just so full as it is. Someday!


Annihilation by Jeff Vandermeer
So I saw the very, very different movie first, which undoubtedly affected my experience reading this short novel. I definitely prefered the movie, but still, what a treat this was. So eerie and ethereal. Truly a unique reading experience - and still unique after seeing the movie. I had been meaning to get around to the Southern Reach trilogy for a few years, and I'm glad a film adaptation finally gave me the push I needed to do so. For what it's worth, and in case you're wondering, the film only adapts this, the first book in the trilogy; I have no idea what's in store in the next two books, but also, honestly, I'm not so sure I care as much. Oh well!

That's all! That's all for now. Hoping to keep up this book pace all year - ten in three months, wow, good for me! - or at least I'm hoping to be back with a few more in a few months. Bye!

April 18, 2018

Imposters: Season 1


Oh wow, look, it's original scripted programming from Bravo. That's where we're at, I guess, and why not?

This season aired last year and Imposters is currently halfway through its second season. I caught the first, on Netflix, over the last month or so. I went in with little more than curiosity - I'd heard vague but generally good things - and stuck around beyond the first episode mainly because it's so easy to keep Netflix on in the background while you're gettin' other shit done on the computer.

But I have to say - somewhere around the fourth or fifth episode of the season, I started paying full attention to the show and not to, say, my computer. And by the final few episodes of the ten-episode season, I was completely in on the show. In that sense, Imposters achieved the near-impossible; it gained momentum and interest from this distracted viewer, rather than doing the opposite.

Does that mean it's a good show? Tough to say! It's a well-written show, I think, or at least well-paced and well-plotted with some interesting characters. And it's a show that constantly shifted and changed gears and twisted and turned, almost like The Good Place does on a near-weekly basis. The best way to show this is to explain what the show is, which is something I haven't done yet after four paragraphs.

So, long and short of it, it's a book about a con-woman whose MO is to marry people and then steal all of their money and then disappear without a trace. Yeah, I know - snooze! So the first episode consists of exactly that - some poor schmo gets duped out of all his money and learns that his too-good-to-be-true bride is, in fact, too good to be true! She's not some soft-spoken Belgian woman at all, but a stone cold, calculating, conniving femme fatale. So the second episode starts, and we've split our focus now, following both the woman as she homes in on her next target, and also her jilted "lover" as he tries to track her down, teaming up with another one of her former victims in the process. So here I'm thinking, okay, this show's going to be about this woman pulling cons on men, and then those men teaming up to track her down. Nope! By the third or fourth episode, the woman's target has changed and the team following her has gained a third member and it seems like the show's going to be about the contrast between this absolute professional (the woman) and the group of stooges chasing after her (her previous victims). Nope! By the fifth or sixth episode, not only has the team caught up to her, but they're now working with her to con the next guy. Except - nope! By the seventh episode or so, the guy figures out exactly what's going on, but also wants in on the plan... for other reasons.

Look, I won't spoil anything else. Suffice it to say, the show was constantly shifting, and so were its characters allegiances, but never in an unbelievable or frustrating way. I can't say I liked it nearly as much as the first season of Sneaky Pete, but I think I liked it more than the second season of Sneaky Pete! (Man, con artist shows are having a bit of a moment, aren't they?)

Anyway, I'll catch up on Season 2 soon enough. But consider giving this one a shot. You might surprise yourself by sticking around for more than an episode or two. I certainly did!

April 11, 2018

Sneaky Pete: Season 2


Sneaky Pete is a show that came out of nowhere last year to scratch an itch left behind by some combination of Breaking Bad and Justified, which is to say that whether or not it was any good - and I do think it was good! - I thoroughly enjoyed it. Here in its second season... man. Not so much! It's amazing how badly this show misses having Bryan Cranston as the big bad guy, even though he was only maybe in, like, one scene per episode in the first season. It's also amazing how much more interested I was in Marius pretending to be Pete for an entire season instead of trying to prove he isn't Pete for, what, half of this season?

I'm ragging too hard. I still liked Sneaky Pete in its second season. This isn't a bad show! But it's also very much not such a good show without a fresh premise or a Bryan Cranston. Now, I'll probably be back fo a third season, but the very idea that I can't fully commit to it is pretty strongly indicative of just how much this show slipped between 2017 and 2018.

April 4, 2018

Baskets: Season 3


Man, the second season of Baskets felt like the third or fourth, and not in a good way, but in a "this series feels interminable" way. I've never really loved this show, and right away from the very outset of the pilot I was only watching it out of respect for Zach Galifianakis and curiosity for Louie Anderson playing his mother.

So I'm happy to say that the third season of Baskets was my favorite yet. It feels like this is the same show it's always been - painfully and awkwardly off-center, a story about a disfunctional family full of broken people - but I could sense a warmth coming from it, this time around, that just hasn't been there for me in years past.

Make no mistake, this is still so far from the upper echelons of my TV rotation - I just think I finally found an actual reason to keep watching it beyond, "because I like Zach Galifianakis in other things he's done." I'll be back for Season 4, no question.

The Detour: Season 3


Oh, right - this ended! I was a strangely big fan of the first two seasons of The Detour - a solid but fairly routine road trip comedy from TBS. But the third season was undeniably the weakest one yet. I still don't hate this - too easy to watch, too consistently funny to ever really dislike, and I never let it build up on the DVR or anything - but putting the family out in the Alaskan wilderness for an entire season felt like the kind of idea that would have made for a great three-episode run but that was dragged all the way out into ten episodes instead. This season's finale also finally brought to an end a weird series-long framing device that never really worked for me, in which the family is getting interviewed after their weird mishaps.

The Detour is probably going to get renewed for a fourth season - has TBS canceled anything yet, since rebooting thir brand? - but it's clear the show was running on fumes already in the third. I'll probably be back for the fourth, if and when it happens. (Again, I do like it!) But I don't have very high hopes. Oh well!