Well, that only took a month. This book was purchased late in June on what can only be described as a total whim. I'd never heard of the book or the author, but I was about to take a week-long vacation in the state the book is named for. Despite having like thirty books already, I figured one more couldn't hurt. The thing is, this bad boy was over a thousand pages long. 1,036, to be precise. In fact, Hawaii was the longest book I can ever remember reading. And this was a strong thousand-pager; the font was small, there were no introductions or end notes that would pad the length, and the shortest version I can find for sale on the Internet is 937 pages (while the longest reaches almost 1,300). So yeah. Legitimately a four-figure page count. But enough about how long the book was; what you all care about is what filled those pages. And really, there's no way to describe the book aside from saying that it was the story of Hawaii. In fact, the island group itself was literally the main "character" of the first twenty pages, which simply described the formation of the islands over the course of millions of years. Then came a chapter on the original Polynesian inhabitants, who sailed all the way to Hawaii in the year 800 without even knowing that it existed. From Bora Bora! That's 3,000 miles. Oh, and yeah - in canoes! Crazy. The next chapter was about the New England missionaries who went off to civilize the islands (i.e., to decry their gods and customs under the threat of eternal hellfire). Next came a chapter on some Chinese immigrants who came in the 1860s, essentially as indentured servants for the very wealthy descendants of the pious missionaries. Then the Japanese showed up, some time around 1900, as plantation workers. The book concludes in the 1950s, when it was written, after the close of World War II but just before Hawaii achieved statehood. The book was actually quite engrossing and enjoyable. I probably read eight or ten separate life stories over the course of the book, of Polynesians, whites, and Asians alike. In fact, much of the narrative takes place in a non-Hawaiian setting; Tahiti, Bora Bora, New England, California, China, Japan, Italy, and France were all prominent settings at one time or another. This was a story about the people who came to Hawaii, albeit at different times and for different reasons. Though their races and origins ranged from all reaches of the Pacific rim, they all shared one thing in common: they dared to begin their lives anew in a strange and unknown land. And they all contributed to Hawaii in their own ways. Toward the end of the book, one visitor scoffs that Hawaii has no identity. She points out that a Chinese girl is wearing a Tahitian grass skirt while doing a Polynesian dance to an American song being played on a Portuguese ukulele by a Japanese man from California. And of course, as a Hawaiian man points out to her, this total blending of cultures is exactly what the identity of Hawaii consists of. Michener did a phenomenal job at breaking up a thousand pages into dozens upon dozens of relevant topics. The frightening human sacrifice rituals of the ancient Polynesians, for example, made for a thrilling twenty-page chunk. Another very immersing thirty pages were spent in the leper colony on Molokai where I read in horror as several beloved characters lost their hands, feet, and faces to leprosy. A lesson in lingual history took up just three or five pages as it was revealed that the only reason the modern Hawaiian alphabet consists of only 12 letters is the fact that early white missionaries did such a piss-poor job at preserving the language with the Latin alphabet; the land was actually called "Havaiki" and its biggest city "Honoruru," but the Americans taught Hawaiians to use W in place of V, L in place of R, P in place of B, and so on. A tragedy, really, in its own right. Speaking of tragedies, the attack on Pearl Harbor took up about ten pages, but the involvement by four Japanese-Americans from Hawaii in World War II took up another forty or so. Even seemingly mundane issues - the process of irrigating the fields, the hybridization of the perfect pineapple, the construction of various infrastructure - are narrated in an interesting way. I'll admit that at times I wanted to start skimming sections of this book, but every time I even began to do so, I'd be sucked right back in within a page; it was a good book from cover to cover, lengthy as it was. I suppose I can neither recommend this book (it was very, very long) nor tell you to avoid it (it was honestly very good). But take that trade-off however you want to. In my case, though I'm glad I read it, I'm also glad it's finally over. I've got a backlog to go through, after all.
July 31, 2010
Friday Night Lights Season 1
Before I watched this show, Steve asked me "Do you like the OC?" I say "Yes, it's my favorite." Steve: "Well you'll love this show then." I didn't see it at first but this show is quite similar to the OC plus some football. It has a really great cast of characters. You've got the loveable second string QB Matt Seracen, his awkward friend Landry, the superstar QB1 Jason Street, his cheerleader gf Lyla, his hard ass drunk best friend Riggins (Texas Forever!), Riggins slutty gf Tyra, and the annoying star running back "Smash". Oh and of course Mr. and Mrs. Coach and their daughter Julie. Man they are good characters. I really didn't like most of them when I started watching the show, but they grew on me throughout the season.
Here's what I can't get over though. Texas. C'mon. There is nobody that should care that much about high school football. It's high school! This team treats its athletes like royalty and probably doesn't give a shit about the Cowboys and Texans. Screw Sunday, friday nights are game nights!
This show was great though. You'll have to watch for yourself: can the Dillon Panthers win States after losing Jason Street (the best high school player in the US!!!)? Good luck to them!
July 29, 2010
The Dark Tower V: Wolves of the Calla
With nothing to do this week I'm finally getting around to posting up the completed, yet neglected, items on my backlist. I finished the 5th installment on my plane ride back to L.A. and was decently please with how it turned out. With Stan still debating on whether to read the series or not - and with two other posts already dedicated to this book - I'll keep this entry short and free of any spoilers.
On a general note: I liked it. I still favor the first three novels above this one, but it sure as hell beats Wizard and Glass (not that the 4th book didn't have its own charms - it just detracted too much from series for me). Unless King can rope in W&G and utilize Roland's backstory within these last two books, I'll consider the story - although, somewhat, entertaining - a complete wash. In fact, I see the the whole series as a two-part trilogy with a meaningless filler in between. We have the first three novels explain how Roland and his ka-tet are form, and then we reach Wolves of the Calla - the beginning of the end. King has set up a new laundry list of problems our heroes will have to overcome throughout the conclusion to this epic (hopefully). I would hate to be wrong about that fact and find the characters mindlessly meandering around for another 1,000 pages, but I doubt that will be the case.
For holding my wandering attention and compelling me to immediate rush into the 6th book (that may or may not include a demon-baby abortion), I give Wolves of the Calla my approval.
July 28, 2010
The I.T. Crowd: Series 1 - 3
When scanning through my Netflix account, I came across this show and chose to watch it purely based on the fact it sported a high rating. Never heard of it. Didn’t know any of the actors. And although it claims to be made by the same producer of The Office, I’ve never seen that show either (the British version, of course). I didn’t expect much from this, to say the least.
However, after making it through the first series (only six episodes), I actually found the show relatively funny. The premise is fairly simple: A woman desperately trying to get a job at this wealthy corporation - I have no idea what it is they make/do - ends up lying her way into the spot as the head of the I.T. Department located in the basement of this well-furnished skyscraper. Down there she finds herself in charge of two geeks despite the fact she knows absolutely nothing about computers. So the hilarity ensues.
I can’t really pinpoint what I find so pleasing about this show. The production value is really not that great (It’s Britain, cut them some slack). I don’t really find the acting phenomenal except for the head boss, Denholm, and his son (later, his replacement), Douglas. Denholm seems like carbon copy of Harvey Birdman’s Phil Ken Sebben - without the eye-patch - who’s always over dramatic and spouting gibberish. I suppose the stories are alright. Original plots, funny predicaments. But I have to make this plea: Give the show a chance.
I watched all three series on Netflix only totaling up to 18 episodes. With every series (I think seasons in the U.K. works as series?) the show gets better. By the middle of the second series, Denholm dies (I didn’t ruin anything... believe me, it’s totally random), and his son, Douglas, steps up as his replacement. He’s louder, fatter, and funnier than his father, definitely bumping up the quality of the show.
Now, I’m not saying you need to run out and see this show, but you should definitely run out and see this show. If you’re only going to give it a quick look over, you might just want to skip to the third series.
Give it a shot. I dare ya.
July 27, 2010
All the Pretty Horses
This was an odd one. Upon returning Cannery Row to its rightful place in a pile of books at my lake house, I stumbled upon my third Cormac McCarthy book: All the Pretty Horses. If the name sounds familiar, it's because it was turned into a movie back in 2000 with Matt Damon and Penelope Cruz. You might remember some of the other books I've posted about here: Blood Meridian details mass murder in Mexico, while The Road has a father and son struggling to survive after the apocalypse. Manly plots, no? All the Pretty Horses has plenty of manliness, sure, but was apparently McCarthy's first attempt at romanticism. There wasn't really a love interest in either of the other books I've read by him, nor in No Country for Old Men, so it definitely took a bit to get used to. The book is seperated into four parts- in part one, protagonist/dumb kid John Grady Cole leaves Texas for Mexico seeking a life of adventure; Part two sees him falling in love with the beautiful Alejandra; in part 3 he's imprisoned with a few friends over a stolen horse, and then in part 4 after realising he'll never win Alejandra back he just goes berserk on a quest for vengeance. The book dealt with a lot of the same themes as Blood Meridian, and definitely had a lot more to it than a simple tale of love lost in Mexico. I guess my only real beef is that damn title- you're a well-respected author, Cormac, why you gotta make me feel like I'm reading a book for little girls?
July 24, 2010
The Matrix Revolutions
The third Matrix movie was a lot like the second one; slow and dragged out to start out, but then action-packed (and confusing) for the second half. Once again, parts of the film - certain characters, really - felt out of place and unnecessary given the "movie trilogy" format here. In particular, an Indian "family" of programs and a train operator with a ton of watches were central characters for the first half hour or so and I'm still really unclear as to what they all added to the film. Once more I feel the need to point out that everything after the first movie could have made for a great miniseries. I mean, if you're just going to put out two movies six months apart anyway, why not drag things out in an episodic way? The first movie remains the best in the trilogy, no question. But this one was at least a little better than Reloaded, which featured a bunch of people in caves dancing and jumping around with sexual energy for a good three minutes or so. I also appreciated that this movie really wasn't all about Neo at all, focusing for a long time on the final stand of humankind defending their last city against the machines. Good action sequences and good CGI helped make this a decent movie. While the plot wasn't fantastic, it did at least provide a sense of closure and a gratifying way of getting there, in my opinion. Here's looking ahead to a solid final week of the Back-Blog's first year. Will it include The Animatrix? Umm, don't hold your breath.
July 21, 2010
The Matrix Reloaded
Jesus, has a DVD cover ever felt so unintentionally uncool? Today was the first time I saw the second Matrix movie all the way through. I'd seen the climactic final half hour before, years ago on HBO, and it left me thinking that this was a complex but cool movie. And it was. But it was really far more of a kung-fu action movie than a sci-fi mindbender and it suffered accordingly. I can't say there wasn't enough plot and I can't say there wasn't enough action and I can't say the movie was too long, but it just didn't wow me nearly as much as its predecessor. The pacing was pretty messed up too; we had people dancing in caves and little else for the first hour of the movie, and then in the final hour we're introduced to a shit ton of important characters - the Merovingian, Persephone, those weird albino twins, the Keymaker, and the Architect - and we're just kind of told what all of their roles are rather than shown. It just seems like instead of two additional movies, the Matrix franchise may have been better off wrapping things up with a miniseries. At least then we could have whole episodes dedicated to these different key characters instead of just ten minutes of screen time and a plethora of explanation. Add in the Smith "rogue virus" subplot, and the fact that he crosses from the cyber world into the real one while Neo acquires the power to control the real world in addition to the cyber one, and everything just seems like one great big mess of a movie. Granted, the fights and action scenes were definitely very cool. I would say that I hope the third movie is a lot better, but I've seen even more of that one (including the ending) and I only remember it being more "what the fuck" styled than this one. Oh well. I'll watch it as soon as Marissa wants to. Based on her reaction to this movie, I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for it to happen.
July 20, 2010
Mad Men Season 3
Here we are, likely the last of Mad Men seasons to be posted on the blog for a long time. While watching the previous season, fellow blogger Trev came over and watched an episode with me. After it was over, he asked incredulously if the show was really supposed to be any good. I wanted to say yes, but I couldn't argue with him- the episode he saw was pretty boring and not much happened for the entirety of season 2. Thankfully season 3 was much better, perhaps better than the first as well. Important plot points are everywhere- death, adultery, firings, a new baby. Hell, a guy who was going to become a higher-up at Sterling Coooper got his foot ripped to shreds in maybe the greatest moment the series has ever had. The season ends with something we knew would have to happen at some point- Betty learns of Don's secret past, prompting her to demand a divorce. The scenes between the two after she found out about this were gripping. It was pretty bizarre to see a man as cool and collected as Don Draper fumbling over words and dropping cigarettes, nervously trying to explain himself. The finale implies that the series is going in a completely new direction, and it has me interested. Hey, look at that, I don't even have to wait a week for it to start up. Good times.
Quidditch Through the Ages
See? I told you it wouldn't be long before I had the second Harry Potter spin-off read. I actually liked this book a lot more than Fantastic Beasts. It is, as you could probably expect, a brief history and rulebook of the fictional sport of quidditch. Parts of this book felt very clever. For instance, quidditch has apparently not caught on as well in the United States as it has around the rest of the world because American wizards prefer a similar but more explosive sport known as "quodpot." (Clearly, a jab at American football by the Rowling, who as a Brit is most assuredly a soccer fan.) However, two American teams of note are pointed out, and one of them happens to be from Fitchburg, Massachusetts. Let's all go see a game sometime, shall we? Another moment I enjoyed was when the book explained that quidditch hasn't done well in the Middle or Far East either because wizards there fly around on carpets instead of broomsticks. That really tickled my funny bone, perhaps because it just seemed like such a racial stereotype, albeit a fictitious one. There were a few other things here and there - anecdotes about famous players and matches, for instance - that made me glad I took the better part of an hour to give this a read. It all just speaks volumes about Rowling's imagination and creative prowess as a writer; she hasn't just come up with a sport for wizards; she's come up with a complete history of said sport. Anyway, although I'm glad I read these two Harry Potter spin-offs (I needed something light and simple after The Metamorphosis), I really should get back to work on the epic tale Hawaii; I'm only halfway done with it, and these last 500 pages aren't going to read themselves.
July 19, 2010
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Earlier today my mom was going through all kinds of things to give away to good will and she told me to sift through a pile of literally hundreds of books (she's a school teacher) for anything I'd want. I saved a few books I had fond memories of from my childhood and two Harry Potter spin-offs from J.K. Rowling (pen-named above as "Newt Scamander" to keep with canonicity). It's a brief and silly book and I wouldn't advise anyone to read it unless they really, really enjoy the Harry Potter franchise and specifically its bestiary of mythical creatures. But at 64 pages in length, this was no time-waster. One aspect of the book that was sometimes cute and sometimes annoying was that it was actually a copy of Harry Potter's personal textbook, and in typical teenager fashion, Harry would write little sarcastic notes in the margins. Some were appreciable, but others just made him seem lame. Anyway, that's all I've got to say about this one and I'm sure I'll get to its companion piece - a book about Quidditch - very soon.
Lost Planet: Extreme Condition
While browsing for games at Gamestop a few months ago I noticed an preview for an upcoming game that looked pretty awesome- Lost Planet 2. It turns out the game got pretty mediocre reviews, but at the time I saw the first installment in the series was a mere 10 bucks- chump change! I picked it up and finally got around to playing it a few days ago. It's a third person shooter that's pretty heavy on the story- I'd say cutscenes made up at least 30% of the gameplay. The story was passable, but nothing of note. The mostakes were readily apparent- some of the controls were clunky, the camera would periodically jump to a poor location, and the gun would sometimes auto-aim in the wrong direction. But these didn't keep me from having fun with it. The action was intense, with tons of well-designed aliens bearing down on protagonist Wayne at all times. A grappling hook provided the game with a few platforming sections but also came in handy during combat, allowing Wayne to get away from a group of enemies easily. The best thing Lost Planet had going for it was the boss fights- all eleven were tough but memorable and action-packed. So yeah, all in all the game was short and kinda mediocre, and it's anyone's guess as to whether I ever pick up the sequel. Oh, who am I kidding, I know I will.
The Metamorphosis
Here's another classic. Quick one. Three chapters, none of them more than twenty pages in length. I definitely read part of this book back in high school. There's a good chance I was supposed to read the whole thing, but regardless, I've done so now. As you most likely know, The Metamorphosis is set in motion when a young man wakes up one day with the body of a giant bug. There's no gradual change like in District 9; the guy is simply a human when he goes to sleep and he's vermin the following morning. The story that ensues is essentially a narrative about the slow and emotionally taxing experience that ensues as his family first tries to accept him for what he is, then only pretends they can accept him, and then finally stops pretending altogether. I realize I may have just "spoiled" the plot, but it doesn't matter because this is a story where the plot takes a backseat to the theme and tone. For such a short little tale - a novella, really - it's been studied and analyzed an awful lot. Because I think most people who spend their lives analyzing literature are pretentious and douchey, I've stayed away from looking up breakdowns and analyses on the Internet. Instead, I'll offer my own quick interpretation. I think the story can easily be paralleled to a man who endures a life-altering injury one day. I haven't bothered to check, but I don't think worker's compensation was around in early 20th century Germany (the setting, or at least when and where the book was written). I think Gregor (the protagonist) could easily represent a handicapped or otherwise disabled person who can no longer work and provide for his family. Said family first tries to cope with the change, then struggles to accept it, then ultimately realizes life would be a lot easier without the burden (for that's all Gregor becomes) around. Perhaps Franz Kafka was trying to use parody and satire in order to seek some sympathy for the disabled. Then again, perhaps I'm either way off on this one or just totally stating the obvious. I wouldn't know; I'm merely an engineer, and critical reading is very difficult for me.
July 18, 2010
The Matrix
Yes, I've seen this classic sci-fi flick before, multiple times. But I decided it'd been too long since I had, recently, and went ahead and bought it from a $5 bargain bin. There's not a lot of poignant or useful reflecting I can do here since I'm pretty sure each and every one of you has seen this (including Marissa, who did so with me today). Instead, I'll just briefly touch upon the legacy of this movie as I view it. First off, wow, eleven years old already? That seems weird. The movie really holds up so, so well. Granted, special effects had kind of realized their potential at some point in the 1990s thanks to groundbreaking movies like T2 and Toy Story, but it's still impressive that this doesn't look campy or shitty in the least. For comparison, Alien 3, a 1992 sci-fi flick (just seven years older) looked like total garbage. Secondly, the philosophical themes presented here, though by no means original or groundbreaking (wait, you mean what I perceive as reality could be... not reality!?), were still enough to really shake 12-year-old me to the core back in the day. The fact that I could - could! - be nothing more than a battery in a vat of pink goo just blew my mind. Now let's turn to the acting. Unfortunately, it was tough to stomach. Every time I see this movie, the acting seems worse and worse. Like, I really try to convince myself that Keanu Reeves just gets a bad rap, but, well, he flat out sucks. Except in Bill & Ted movies. Also, Carry-Anne Moss just isn't that attractive in this movie and it kind of creeps me out that her character is (or at least used to be) considered a sex symbol for computer nerds. Know what else feels a bit lame in hindsight? The wardrobes. When Neo, Trinity, and the rest of the crew enter the Matrix, they're decked out to the nines in vinyl leather trench coats and sunglasses. I know the late '90s were a very different time, fashion-wise, but the whole ensemble just looks like a group of angry goth kids who you'd never want to fuck with. Throw in all 0f their firearms and the whole thing just bears a very unfortunate resemblance to the Columbine massacre, and not only because the film was released less than a month beforehand. Anyway, my only point is that these guys don't look like badasses as much as anti-establishment anarchists with damaged psyches and vinyl leather fetishes. Still, all things considered, the movie holds up very well and I think the past eleven years have proven that it is a true classic and not just a niche movie with a cult following. If memory serves me correctly, the next two movies in the franchise lacked that feel of timeless greatness, but they also lacked the gothic subculture outfits. And I'll take that tradeoff happily.
July 17, 2010
Mad Men Season 3
This season was damn good. I had to get through the first three season before July 25th, and with the rate I watch shows I figured it would take me right up to the deadline. Aided by a mini vacation in the Cape, I flew through the second and third seasons. The second season did not end with any huge revelation, so I wasn't sure how the third season would be, but I was happy. Th season focused on Sterling Cooper now part of a British firm, and their struggles. In addition, the season is heavily Don and Betty centric. And boy do they have problems! Don is still cheating on Betty (does this surprise you anymore?) and Betty started retaliating. The season ends AWESOME. It was one of my favorite season finales in a lot of the tv shows I have watched. I won't spoil it, but I am super excited to see how Draper and co. are doing (plus Joan!) when season four begins. Over and out.
The Call of the Wild
This is the third book I've read about sled dogs in the past seven months. This one was different from Dogsong and Stone Fox, however. Not only is it a classic from 1903, but the whole story is told from a dog's perspective. Now, before you get all excited (looking at you, Marissa), I should caution you that this dog is no cute little puppy or lovable lazy old thing that loafs around all day. No, this dog is a monster. He's a 140-pound killing machine. I mean, seriously, over the course of the short novel he killed several other sled dogs and a few people before becoming the alpha male in a wolf pack (by killing all contenders). Yeah, you heard me. A domesticated St.Bernard-Collie mix from California becomes the alpha male in a wolf pack in the middle of Canada. This, and many other parts of the story, seemed a bit far-fetched and unlikely, to say the least. And that'd be fine if this story was written with the tone of a tall tale, but it wasn't meant to be one at all. I didn't particularly enjoy this book, though some of the dog's exploits were laughably over-the-top at least. The book was a short one (my own copy was 62 pages; most have smaller pages and larger print and are around the 150 range), but I still wouldn't say it's worth your time. Oh well. Not every book can be a winner. Right, Dan Brown?
July 16, 2010
The Grey King
This Newbery winner is actually the fourth book in a series of five called the Dark is Rising series. I never read (or owned) the first three books and I certainly won't be reading the fifth one either. The Grey King takes place in Wales and is allegedly very accurately based on several geographical locations and physical features, even if it's not exactly a faithful rendition of Welsh mythology. Wait a second. Does anyone give a shit about this book? I don't. Let's call it a wrap.
Unforgiven
Call this "the night of Best Picture winners starring Clint Eastwood and Morgan Freeman," I guess. Unforgiven has a reputation that precedes it, so unlike with Million Dollar Baby, I actually went into this with very high expectations. And the movie may or may not have delivered; it's too early to tell. My chief criticism is that although the movie didn't have an absurd running time (two hours and change), it still felt way too long. I attribute this to a pointless character in the beginning of the movie who did nothing to advance the plot or create atmosphere for the main characters (Clint Eastwood and Morgan Freeman). In fact, the vast majority of the action and suspense came in the final twenty minutes of the movie. Which means the first 110 minutes kind of dragged and made me wonder why this was such an acclaimed movie. Clint Eastwood's character, "Munny," was certainly extremely memorable. But Morgan Freeman's wasn't, at all. In fact, I already can't remember one specific line of dialogue or facial expression from Morgan Freeman, and I only stopped watching the movie like fifteen minutes ago. So for the second straight time, he really added nothing to an Oscar-winner. Strange. Anyway, I can't say I love this movie, but then again, I have trouble appreciating Westerns. And that's strange too, because I've got no trouble appreciating cowboys and gunfights and the like. Oh well. I'm just glad to have another Best Picture crossed off my viewing list and another chunk removed from my movie backlog. Eleven films remain along with all five seasons of The Wire.
Million Dollar Baby
When I sat down earlier tonight to watch 2004's "Best Picture," I was well aware of the way it ended. I think everybody, by now, is well aware of the way it ends whether they've seen it or not. Still, I'll not speak of said ending because doing so would be, well, a major spoiler. The thing is, I'm glad I knew the spoiler from the get-go. It allowed me to view the film with different expectations. I was prepared for the fateful twist in the narrative instead of confused and angry once it happened. Actually, even though this was a Best Picture winner, I went in with moderate expectations. A number of my friends, most notably my girlfriend, have voiced their distaste for this boxing flick. The thing is, I kind of liked it. I mean, I'm not in love with it, but I definitely think it was a solid and enjoyable movie. And knowing what was coming was instrumental, I think, in my approval of the film. Clint Eastwood impressed me very much in his role as an angry, mean, no-nonsense trainer. Total bad-ass. Pleasantly surprising was Hilary Swank. Some people hate her. I guess I can see why, but I think she nailed the title role perfectly. Really, who else could have played a tough female boxer with charm and spunk? And Morgan Freeman was just kind of typical. Aside from a great scene in which he knocks out an asshole who was mocking a retarded kid, there's really nothing that he adds to this movie besides his narration prowess. Anyway, I enjoyed this movie very much and I'm fine with the fact that it won Best Picture in 2004.
July 14, 2010
Les Misérables (1998)
Victor Hugo's famous 1862 novel has been turned into a number of movies (as well as a miniseries and a musical) but this one, from 1998, is probably the consensus film adaptation of choice. Now, I've always loved the musical and one of my most daring ambitions is to read the aforementioned 365-chapter (not page, but chapter) book. So my expectations were high (but realistic) heading into this movie. And I ended up satisfied. The musical is much better and I imagine the lengthy book is as well, but standing on its own accord in a vacuum, this was not a bad movie. I won't compare and contrast it to the musical because doing so would certainly spoil elements of the story and I'm pretty sure nobody on Back-Blogged has had the pleasure of enjoying it yet. Suffice it to say that due to time limitations, much was cut from the musical (and far more from the book, I'm sure). What was left behind was very much the barebones story of Valjean and Javert (with appropriate involvement by Fantine and Cosette). The Thénardiers appear in just one scene and the grown-up Éponine is never even seen. Marius remained, but in a heavily bastardized role that saw him as the leader, rather than a hesitant member, of the student-led revolt. And without Éponine's involvement, the romance between Cosette and Marius felt very regular and bland. I actually didn't enjoy Claire Danes' portrayal of Cosette; she was difficult to like. Geoffery Rush made a very suitable Javert, and the only actor I could think of that seemed a more natural fit for the role was Alan Rickman. Liam Neeson was fine as Valjean, though the character was slightly damaged in my eyes when Valjean slapped Cosette late in the movie, something the real Valjean would absolutely never do! (Screenplay's fault, not Neeson's.) Lastly, Uma Thurman was probably my favorite casting call. She did an excellent Fantine and really impressed me as more than just a Tarantino vehicle. Between this film and her work in The Producers, I think she's earned my respect as a legitimate actress and not just a female bad-ass typecast. Anyway, back to Les Misérables. It felt very front-heavy, by which I mean that the majority of the film was dedicated to events that took place prior to the intermission in the musical. We're talking about a ninety-minute to thirty-minute split here. In fact, things really slowed to a crawl near the middle of that second hour. Fortunately, the film ended with the right amount of action, drama, and tragedy that made the second act of the musical so enjoyable. And please note that this movie adaptation of a 365-chapter book managed to have a running time of just two hours and change. Yes, plenty was trimmed out, but the movie still felt complete and enjoyable. Adding just another half-hour could have really made it much more fulfilling, at least by including Éponine and expanding on the romance between Marius and Cosette. Now tell me how a 365-chapter mega-novel can be made into a great two-and-a-half-hour movie but Harry Potter 7 needs to be split into two separate two-hour-plus movies. Worse yet, why does the fourth Twilight book need to be two movies long? Or Peter Jackson's attempt at The Hobbit? What happened to the art of sufficient movie editing? Why is less no longer more? But alas, I am ranting. Allow me to wrap things up by recommending Les Misérables. Not only this movie, but also (and especially) the musical in all its glory. Someday, I hope to be able to speak as highly about the book. But that day is at least a year from now. I mean seriously, even if I were to buy the book today, and even if I went at the ambitious pace of a chapter a day, it'd still take me a year to finish. Do you see why I'm holding off on that one? It's two and a half Moby-Dicks. It's Gone with the Wind plus another 500 pages. It's in the same league as Atlas Shrugged and War and Peace. And someday, I'll have it logged. Every last word. But not yet. Not yet, dear readers. Not yet.
The Book of Eli
Alright, so last night while I was heading off to sleep I though I would pop on this iTunes rental that the iTunes store recently returned to me after I so foolishly deleted it from my computer before ever watching. Had I never received this second copy for free and never watched it, I wouldn't have missed much. Even though the film clocks in under 2 hours, it still felt slow as all hell. Just to give you a bit of a premise: It's the apocalypse (doesn't matter how it happened... it happened) and this lone solider named Eli (Mmmm... Denzel) is crossing the country's barren wastelands to reach the west coast in hopes of finding a safe home for his one prized possession, his Bible. Upon route, he stops at a ruthless, savage town to get water where he causes a bit of a ruckus. Carnegie (Gary Oldman), the town's mayor (or something?), gets caught up in the dispute and learns that Eli has the Bible. Carnegie, and avid reader, must get the book so he may use its powers to enslave mankind. Eli takes off, Carnegie follows. So begins the chase. Yawn.
Knowing this, I though the movie might be this new, cool-aged western touching upon some commentary at the power of religion (Eli flights to preserves the power of faith where Carnegie looks to use religion to dupe people into following him). Na. Much of it focuses of Eli slumping around the desert knocking down any looters who gets in his path. I'll admit the fights scenes are pretty well choreographed, but is far from saving the stale tone and pacing of the whole flick. The only other redeeming quality to this whole movie was Gary Oldman. Easily one of my all-time favorite actors (right up there with Jimmy Stewart, Alec Guinness, Leo DiCaprio, and Bruce Campbell), Oldman's always exciting to see on screen. Definitely not his greatest performance - but hey - still entertaining.
Considering this flick is still new on the shelves, I assume there's the possibility some of you out there in "blog-world" may still want to watch it. For that reason, I don't want to go too much into the plot when explain the list of grievances I have, but I will end with this. The conclusion is so weak and anti-climatic it makes me proud to be an atheist.
July 13, 2010
Uncle Buck
Here's a late '80s comedy that had all the right pieces in place - Macaulay Culkin back when he was a cute kid, John Candy back when he was alive, and John Hughes back when his filmography was still respectable. But for some reason, it wasn't nearly the comedy classic I hoped it'd be. The premise was absurdly bland and boring. When the parents leave town due to a family emergency, the wacky (and titular) Uncle Buck is the only available babysitter. Through many somewhat zany misadventures, the kids learn to love him and each other, but he learns the greatest lesson of all when he realizes that life is short and family is precious and he should finally settle down with his longtime girlfrie- Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... (Seriously though, I really did drift off during this movie. Granted, I was tired.) Ultimately Uncle Buck turned out not to be even close to the classic '80s comedy I had hoped and thought it was. Like, see any other John Candy movie but this one and you'll be happy with your decision. Let's just wake up from our nap, move along, and forget this ever happened, shall we?
Kirby 64: The Crystal Shards
By finishing off this game, I've not only made another subtraction to my backlog; I've killed off an entire system. That's right. No more Nintendo 64 games lie unbeaten on my video game shelf. (At least, for now; the collection stands at a mere six games, and I know many more quality games lie out there, so who's to say I won't buy another N64 game at some point?) Even though the overall list still stands at 63 games and one game means so little in the scheme of things, there's just a nice feel to being all done with an entire "era" of games. I finished off all of my Super Nintendo games with Super Metroid last month and now I'm just two GameBoy games and two PlayStation games away from being done with everything from last millennium. That's huge! Know what else is huge? Out of the 227 video games I have beaten in my lifetime, this is the very first Kirby one. I mean, I know Kirby isn't quite the franchise that Zelda or Final Fantasy is, but it's still a Nintendo mainstay that has put forth ten unique titles in the past twenty years. I enjoyed my first foray into the land of Kirby. (Dreamland?) Kirby's ability-copying mechanism - the backbone of the gameplay throughout the entire series - is definitely the only thing that sets this game apart from the multitude of other sidescrolling platformers. I enjoyed trying out new abilities and combinations of abilities for the first half of the game or so, but after that it got pretty stale and I was solely trying to beat the game. Fortunately, the whole thing is little more than a three-hour affair. And more fortunately, it's a fun one. The game kind of ends in a half-assed manner unless you go out of your way to find every single titular crystal shard strewn throughout the levels, but I can forgive a weak ending when the gameplay is so simple and yet so fun.
Up in the Air (2009)
I was worried about watching this movie so quickly on the heels of both Burn After Reading and Fantastic Mr. Fox. (Yes, I watched Fantastic Mr. Fox recently. I did not post about it here because I watched it on television. I do not own the movie. It was never part of my backlog.) Too much George Clooney, after all, can really dampen a man's attitude toward a film. But I have to say that George Clooney was fantastic in this film, as were the two supporting actresses who received Oscar nominations for their parts. There was a solid and entertaining story there, too, that was neither uplifting nor depressing. Actually, the whole thing very much reminded me of Thank You For Smoking, only with better acting and a slightly more serious tone. I liked it a lot and I definitely give it a hearty recommendation. The ending seemed a tad weak, but maybe it was just more open-ended or unresolved than I wanted it to be. Overall, the flick lived up to its hype, and that's all I wanted it to do.
Alien 3
Well, well. As I could have predicted, I ended up enjoying Alien 3 much more than Aliens. The reason isn't that this was a better movie; the reason is differing expectations. As was the case with The Godfather last winter, the second movie was too overhyped and couldn't have been anything aside form a letdown, while the shat-upon third movie at least succeeded in pleasantly surprising me. This was the only movie in the trilogy where the ending actually surprised me whatsoever. It may not have been anything all that special, but at least it didn't end with a self-destruct sequence. I also really appreciated the beginning of the movie. Minor spoiler alert, but Aliens ended with Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) and three other people escaping impending doom in an escape pod. Alien 3 starts with the escape pod crash landing, killing everyone on board but Ripley. Apparently James Cameron was furious with this; the three characters he had specifically chosen to survive were done away with instantaneously, negating their epic survival in the previous movie altogether. But you know what? Forget James Cameron. He did what he wanted to with his movie, and the franchise owed him nothing more. I absolutely love the big "fuck you" that the screenwriters gave him by killing off his precious characters and advancing the story in their own way. Anyway, this completes my movie goal for July, but not the Aliens franchise. See, although the series so far has not blown me away, I'm a real sucker for franchise completion when it comes to my massive DVD collection. So I've already gone ahead and ordered Alien Resurrection from Amazon and only upon its arrival (and viewing) can I make my final judgments on the series as a whole. (Who cares about the Alien vs. Predator spin-offs?) But for now, I've got plenty of DVDs to watch thanks to an insane ten-movie purchase at Target the other day. Onward!
Mad Men: Season Two
With Stan getting Marissa and me on the Mad Men bandwagon, you can expect a flurry of posts on the first three seasons of the show- season 4 premieres in less than two weeks! Since I need to get caught up, I saw most of the episodes of Mad Men's second season on demand, catching the last few on a borrowed DVD (assist to Stan). I can't say that season two lived up to the greatness that was season one- for the first four episodes, I was downright bored. By the fifth, protagonist Don Draper gets into a drunken car crash which sets up the main conflict for the rest of the season (and will likely continue in season three)- a huge feud with his wife with the possibility of a divorce. This felt like when the season got back on the right track. The repercussions of the events in season one are all dealt with, most notably Pete's cheating on his wife with Peggy. All of the minor characters felt a bit more fleshed out this time around, and they were always there with a snappy one-liner. But in the end, the season just wasn't nearly as interesting as the first. I wanted more of Don coming up with genius ad campaigns. I liked that originally the show focused on the mixed morals of working in advertising, and this season it felt like it could have been replaced with any other business. At least from what I've heard season three is much more fun to watch than two. Expect a write-up for that within the next two weeks- I wouldn't want to be behind by the premier.
July 12, 2010
Aliens
After getting through Alien, which has been critically praised and is heralded as a classic, but which just did not work for me here in the present year of 2010, I was looking forward to Aliens. James Cameron seemed a slight upgrade over Ridley Scott, the year 1986 seemed an upgrade over 1979, and the action genre seemed like it'd be a better fit for Sigourney Weaver and the film content than horror was. But at the end of the day, I think Aliens may have been just as cliche and regular as its predecessor. Some generic "characters" met non-emotional demises while Sigourney Weaver took on a maternal role for what seemed to be no reason. A few explosions occurred that were rather cheesy by today's standards and in the end the good guys prevailed in spite of heavy losses. Yawn. Look, this movie is older than me, so I get that I should have some respect for what a landmark film it was in its own time, but I would certainly stop far short of calling the film "amazing" or "revolutionary" by any stretch. Pardon me for using Star Wars as a benchmark, but I mean, better science fiction movies than Aliens had been made before 1986. I'm just a bit tired of all the genericness in this franchise so far. Aliens are depicted as monsters without any explanation for their animal behavior. Gunfire and explosions run amok. And, yeah, the films are now two for two at ending with a self-destruct sequence for a climax. How memorable! I'll watch Alien 3 pretty soon, but only because I already own it and need to overcome my own backlog; on the merits of the first two films alone, there's no way I'd rush off to see the next installment of Sigourney Weaver looking frightened while everyone around her dies.
Curb Your Enthusiasm: Season 7
Man, this is one funny show. Season 7 aired in 2009 and Season 8 won't air until 2011 (after Seasons 5 and 6 aired in '05 and '07 respectively), and with just ten episodes per season, the series is only putting out an average of five episodes a year lately. But the vast amounts of time between the seasons are well worth the wait; Curb Your Enthusiasm is flat-out hilarious. And this season was just as good as any other. The main story arc here is that Larry David devises a plan to win back his ex-wife by creating a Seinfeld reunion and casting her in it as George's ex-wife. So, in essence, the last two episodes of Season 7 of Curb Your Enthusiasm are somewhat of a Seinfeld reunion. Now, I enjoyed the Seinfeld bits last November, but that was before I sat down and watched the entire series from beginning to end. Seeing them again, they resonate so much better. I'm all the more impressed that they got so many recurring Seinfeld characters to reunite for an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. And make no mistake - Season 7 contains plenty of humor that has nothing to do with Seinfeld or any of its characters or actors. In fact, just three of the ten episodes included said actors; the other seven were full of typical Curb nonsense and debauchery. I feel pretty incoherent right now, so I'll just wrap this up and give Curb Your Enthusiasm a hearty recommendation. Also, kudos to Michael Richards for being able to poke fun at himself in one episode for his infamous "nigger" incident.
July 11, 2010
Final Fantasy
You may remember in a recent post I reviewed Final Fantasy IV, my first foray into the world of Final Fantasy. I was hooked before I even finished, and began searching out the rest of the games in the series. It's up to 13 titles now, as well as spin-offs, and the games are notoriously long, so I certainly have my work cut out for me. The good news is that the series has some of the most highly-praised games in history, so I'll probably enjoy most of them. Rather than jump into another nostalgic classic however, I decided to go to the game's roots and play the first of the series- Final Fantasy. While the game was revolutionary for its time in 1987, it didn't have many of the trademarks that later installments were known for. The engaging story of FF4 is gone, replaced with a generic "find the crystals" quest, complete with wind water earth and fire crystals. Stop me if you've heard that one before. The combat is much more simplistic too- in Final Fantasy IV I found myself making important decisions and sacrifices mid-battle that kept the combat exciting. In FF1 it came down entirely to determining each character's most powerful move and spamming the hell out of it. So clearly, I didn't enjoy the first Final Fantasy as much as Final Fantasy IV, but that doesn't mean I didn't have fun with it. I was trying to figure out why early on, and I still believe it's because of two main reasons. First, it's way too early for the same old RPG formula to have gotten stale for me- I think this is only the sixth RPG I've ever played. That may seem like a lot, but compare it with the number of platformers and FPS's I've posted in this Blog alone, and it's just not that much. Second, Final Fantasy had something important that IV did not- no grinding! At no point did I really feel like I had to do battles just for the experience. The random battles that I fought in on the way to the next part of the quest were always enough to level me up for the next boss. That kept the game short (12-ish hours) but enjoyable. So yeah, overall I can't say I'm disappointed to jump back to the first game of the series- it's no high point, but it was a short fun play. Next up I'm thinking of going after the most popular one of all- Final Fantasy VII.
Burn After Reading
This was one of those "smart" comedies that are never laugh-out-loud funny but always get praised unanimously by critics and film elitists. It also happened to be a pretty dark comedy. Think of it as being something like Fargo set in DC. It's a Coen brothers movie, after all, something I was totally unaware of (somehow) until watching it just now. And like almost every other Coen brothers movie I can think of, this one was an entertaining ride that twisted and turned but ultimately ended without any real resolution. I'm not complaining; I more or less saw such an ending (or lack thereof) coming, and the acting, direction, and cinematography were fantastic. George Clooney was very entertaining in his role as an idiotic U.S. Marshal and John Malkovich stole the show as an irate and pathetic ex-CIA analyst. Frances McDormand (Fargo's breakout star, Marge the pregnant police chief) was just as pleasantly surprising this time around as an aging and insecure gym trainer who goes to great lengths (including selling government secrets to the Russians) for the sake of financing some cosmetic surgery. Rounding out the main cast were Tilda Swinton (same cold and bitchy role she always plays) and Brad Pitt (unfortunately an egregious miscast for the role of a thick-headed and childish gym trainer). Brad Pitt had a number of great moments as Chad the meathead, but I attribute these to the screenplay's writing more than his acting. It just seemed like he was uncomfortable acting so foolishly, and that's a shame because great actors should be capable of playing all kinds of roles. Look at Matt Damon and the number of morons he's played in his lifetime, for instance. Even George Clooney said in an interview regarding his role that he's "done playing idiots" now. Really, man? Come on. What's with this "above acting stupid" vanity from the two leads from the Ocean's trilogy? Regardless, the movie was still pretty good and I think it's worth the ninety minutes it takes to view it. Just don't expect a decent ending. Expect a Coen brothers ending. No Country For Old Men. The Big Lebowski. You know the drill.
Alien
Just two months ago, I found the first three Alien movies at Best Buy for $5 apiece. I decided to go ahead and splurge on the trilogy. The move made sense, mostly. At the time, I had just 13 DVDs still backlogged and nine of them were TV sets; with just Saving Private Ryan, The Fugitive, The Naked Gun, and Drag Me to Hell remaining, I figured an expanse of three new movies couldn't hurt. Now, having seen all of the aforementioned flicks besides Saving Private Ryan (which I have had since 2003 and which has become the symbolic poster child of my movie backlog), this is technically the junior ranking member of my movie backlog. Or at least, it was before tonight; I've now completed Ridley Scott's 1979 sci-fi horror classic. I know this movie is thirty years old and thus thirty years outdated, but it just didn't blow me away like I hoped it would. Sweeney, who half-watched it with me while playing Final Fantasy on GBA (nice commitment!), pointed out that horror movie conventions that seem cliche today probably hadn't been fully established in 1979, so maybe the very predictable occurrences throughout the film were surprising at the time of original release. I'll admit that the acting was fantastic and the writing quite believable, but the whole thing - which must have had amazing special effects for its day - just felt very campy. But hey, movies have come a long, long way in the past thirty years. And it shows. Either way, I'm happy to have finally seen this classic horror flick, especially because now I can move on to James Cameron's sequel, Aliens, which seems to be widely considered the best movie in the franchise and a true gem of the 1980s. Here's hoping for something that feels just a little less dated.
July 10, 2010
Shaun of the Dead
So, after being urged to watch this by some fellow bloggers, I decided to pop it in to the PS3. Compared to Hot Fuzz? Night and day. Although I had seen this once like 6 years ago, it was with some really annoying people in Davis, so I don't think I gave it a fair shake. However, after being able to enjoy it in the comfort of my own home without the annoyance of anyone trying to talk to me, I have to admit that this is one of the better movies I've seen in a while. While I did not understand some of the humor or some of the dialogue (I'm not British), I still could appreciate a good movie. Not only was this a good hilarious movie, it was a good Zombie movie in its own right. I think that's what was missing from Hot Fuzz. It never really established itself as a good action movie. Also, there were a lot of jokes in this one that were revisited in Hot Fuzz. Perhaps if I watched these movies in the right order, I would have appreciated Hot Fuzz more. Still, that just speaks poorly of Hot Fuzz.
Okay, sorry for ripping Hot Fuzz again. Back to the movie at hand. Everything about Shaun of the Dead was either awesome or funny. Every character was awesome in his or her own right. My favorite character was definitely the douchebag pussy with glasses. He wanted to bang Simon Pegg's girlfriend and spoiler, he got his. Whatever, I'm sure you have all seen it. If not, see it. I will definitely be watching this movie again sometime. I am happy to have it in my collection.
July 9, 2010
Mad Men Season 2
I'm at work, and it's Friday afternoon. My lab work is done, and I have not data to analyze. What the hell else am I supposed to do?
So I have been making my way through Mad Men for the fourth season starting on July 25th. I was told coming into season two, that it was the worst of the three. I agree (so far) with that opinion, but I don't think it was bad.
It was slow from the start. There were some pretty cool things happening at the end of season 1, and they jumped ahead a year and a half and glazed over many of the things until later episodes.
The season did pick up after that though. With the addition of Colin Hanks as a priest, we learned some more about Peggy and her family. Roger Sterling goes through some major family changes. Don Draper is, surprise, still cheating on his wife. Joan gets some more face time in this season which I appreciate because she is a good character. In general, there wasn't enough focus on the other guys at the office though.
Overall though, good stuff. Kinda boring ending. Off to season 3!
On a side note, I feel like I had something else to write about. Does anyone know what it is?
July 5, 2010
Resident Evil 3: Nemesis
Understandably backlogress has slowed since our fantastic final day of June, what with the long beautiful weekend that was meant to be spent outside- I spent my 4th of July at Lake Winnipesaukee with friends and because of this I read no books and played no games. But today I finished off the fifth of seven total Resident Evil games- Resident Evil 3: Nemesis. You might remember that last two REs I reviewed- Resident Evil, which was alright, and Resident Evil 2, which I loved. The hilariously bad voice-acting and static cameras return for this one, as well as the poor controls- protagonist Jill Valentine controls more like a truck than a person. But I'll be honest, at this point I'm used to it and it's really not bothering me. The first half of Resident Evil 3 takes place just one day before RE2, and the second half takes place just days after, and this made for some interesting plot points- some of the unexplained events in 2 are really just the consequences of Jill's actions in 3. There are minor changes in gameplay here- the ability to easily change your vertical aim is the most welcome, as this was a pain in previous installments. Resident Evil 3 also introduced a nice new threat, the aforementioned Nemesis- a superpowered invincible monster who can show up at random and kick your ass. Seriously, it was necessary to kill this guy on like 5 separate occasions and each time was more difficult than any boss encounter from RE1 or 2. Overall though the changes really didn't do enough to make Resident Evil 3 stand out from the pack at all- it was fun, but will likely be quickly forgotten. Hopefully my last two games in the franchise, prequel Resident Evil Zero and spin-off Code: Veronica introduce something fresh into the franchise.
July 4, 2010
Common Sense
Ladies and gentlemen, as promised, here is Thomas Paine's Common Sense. Prior to purchasing it a few months ago, I had always heard the work referred to as a "pamphlet." Unless you like your pamphlets to be 58 pages long, this, my fellow Americans, is no pamphlet. But, yeah, it's still a damn short read. And an interesting one too. Everyone who paid any attention at all in high school American history class should know that Common Sense was an effort by Paine to persuade his fellow colonists into getting down with independence. It was wildly successful, and having read it, I can see why; it's literally just a bunch of common sense! Paine starts by attacking the concept of monarchy in general. "Why does one guy get to tell a bunch of others what to do?" he asks. "What makes him a more capable leader than the rest of us?" Paine holds no punches when it comes to the even more ridiculous concept of hereditary monarchy. "Why are the descendants of a bunch of French invaders ruling England anyway? Why should any king's descendants make good kings themselves at all?" Next, Paine gives an extensive list of reasons for American independence; these are the heart and soul of his pamphlet and the ones you're most likely to find quoted in history books. Then, out of nowhere, Paine jumps into an argument for why we should have an American navy. It made a lot of sense, like everything else in Common Sense, but it just felt so out-of-the-blue. I guess Paine was simply saying, "It'd be really easy for us to make a navy, and that's another great reason to cut ties with Britain." Finally, at least in the edition I read, Paine ends with an appendix in which he responds to a Quaker who had published something in favor of loyalism to Britain. Paine basically ripped him a new one, throwing jabs at Quakerism along the way. He ended by advising the Quaker to think before he publishes something. It seemed very catty and much like a textbook Internet fight. I was sort of disappointed that it was even included in my edition of Common Sense, but I guess I can't complain about getting more bang for my two bucks. Anyway, Common Sense was the only sub-100-page book remaining on my backlog; now it's time for me to return to my only super-1000-pager, Hawaii.
Candide
July 1, 2010
June 2010 Recap
June was a pretty satisfying month. All six members contributed something and we once again had a flair for the dramatic, logging ten items on the final day of the month to give us 35 on the month instead of 25. That means we did 40% of our damage in one day, tying our previous record high for loggings in a day. And perhaps more importantly, 19 comments were made in the final five days of the month. That's huge! Guys, we never comment on each other's shit. I'm impressed. A month ago, I was worried that this project was dying, but I have new found hope in our little book/game/movie club.
But enough about us; let me talk about me. I abandoned my old monthly goal - for everything new, finish two other items - in June, opting for a more specific approach of simply giving myself a list of things to beat, read, or watch. And I aced it! Progress for the month was also made in all three categories, as I decreased my book, game, and video counts by 1, 7, and 2, respectively.
Last month I gave myself 6 games to beat, 4 books to read, and 3 TV seasons to watch. I cut it a bit close, especially with the books, but it was certainly a right-sized goal. This month, I'm in Hawaii for a week and then I finally join the workforce almost as soon as I get back; less progress can be expected, so less shall be self-assigned. On the book front, it makes total sense for me to finish Hawaii and I'd be remiss not to read Thomas Paine's Common Sense in the spirit of the fourth. With video games, I should really get around to beating one on PS3. LittleBigPlanet it is. Additionally, I haven't beaten a handheld game or a Final Fantasy game in ages, so it makes sense to kill two birds with one stone and finish Final Fantasy III. Know what? Final Fantasy Tactics Advance as well. Four birds with two stones, or whatever you want to call it. Since all three of the aforementioned games are already in progress and roughly half beaten, I'll throw in my final N64 game, Kirby 64. In the final department of movies and TV shows, I'm fairly well off with just 7 movies and 6 TV seasons to go. Let me promise the first three Alien movies, Season 7 of Curb Your Enthusiasm, and at least one season of The Wire. That's 2 books, 4 games, and 5 DVDs. A large plate, no doubt, but I need lofty goals if I'm to overcome my lofty mountain of backlogged items.
I encourage the rest of you to make some specific monthly goals as well. Even if only a couple. It's very liberating, in a weird way, to rob yourself of the freedom to finish whatever you want whenever you want to. Anyway, good luck and Godspeed!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)